For the previous week, I’ve watched my beloved metropolis of Los Angeles change into engulfed in flames.
My coronary heart aches figuring out that the locations I as soon as liked—the Will Rogers seashore home, the Palisades lookout, and a drive up the Pacific Coast Freeway—won’t ever be the identical. As a flurry of social media posts floods my feed, I’ve observed public well being officers’ plea for residents to stay indoors, minimizing the danger of respiration unhealthy air. Below the guise of decreasing the unfold of fireside in residential areas and decreasing hurt to individuals surrounded by these supplies, the flame retardant chemical business has unfold like wildfire itself. These wind-borne flame retardants now threaten our well being and stay within the mud and ash blown across the metropolis.
Wildfire smoke might be extraordinarily dangerous to human and environmental well being. The principle element of smoke is particulate matter, which may penetrate deep into the lungs or enter the bloodstream, inflicting quite a few respiratory, cardiovascular, and even cognitive results. Nevertheless, as wildfires have change into extra widespread in city areas, their smoke is now prone to embody quite a few poisonous supplies together with lead, asbestos, and arsenic. For the reason that LA fires have decimated residential areas, it’s probably that poisonous chemical substances from a number of sources, together with plastics, paint, and furnishings have been launched into the air.
Many of those family merchandise really embody flame retardants, chemical substances added to supplies to forestall or scale back the unfold of fireside. Flame retardants turned widespread within the mid 1900s after the tobacco business’s profitable marketing campaign shifted consideration away from cigarettes as a trigger of fireside deaths and as a substitute aimed to highlight flammable supplies within the family because the main reason behind residential fires. The tobacco corporations argued that even when cigarettes created an preliminary spark, for instance, on a sofa, the ensuing fireplace might be mitigated and slowed by including fireplace retardant chemical substances to the material and mattress that make up the couch. The marketing campaign was so highly effective that California adopted a Technical Bulletin (TB) 117 in 1975 requiring that supplies used to fill furnishings face up to an open flame for not less than 12 seconds. This inspired the mass implementation of flame retardant chemical substances in furnishings, electronics, and constructing supplies to satisfy the brand new customary. The federal authorities has additionally allowed the proliferation of a whole lot of various flame retardants contained in family merchandise as a consequence of traditionally lax laws underneath the Poisonous Substances Management Act.
Previously decade, although, flame retardant requirements have change into a legally contentious challenge. Quite a few research have illustrated the poisonous results of flame retardants together with: brominated flame retardants (BFRs) generally present in electronics linked to endocrine disruption and thyroid dysfunction, organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) utilized in textiles growing danger to bone and mind well being, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) present in furnishings linked to neurodevelopmental problems, and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) usually utilized in plastic paints linked to most cancers. Additional, Nationwide Institute of Well being (NIH)-funded research have proven an elevated danger of untimely start when pregnant ladies had been uncovered to flame-retardant chemical substances, and lots of researchers have proposed that flame retardant mixtures could play a task in metabolic problems together with weight problems and hypertension.
Given this abundance of analysis, in 2013, California revised the previous customary set by TB 117 (now named TB 117-2013). The revised customary nonetheless requires supplies to face up to an open flame, however it doesn’t require flame retardant chemical substances to satisfy this customary. As an alternative, the rule permits unhazardous supplies together with wool and leather-based or manufacturing strategies together with weights, weaves, and blends of materials to attain this purpose. Additional, Senate Invoice No. 1019, handed in 2014, requires all supplies that proceed to make use of flame retardant supplies to affix a label to the product informing the patron of the chemical substances current. As of January 2020, with the passing of recent amendments to Proposition 65, California has banned the sale and distribution of recent furnishings and youngsters’s merchandise made for residential use if these merchandise include greater than 0.1% of chemical substances used for flame retardant functions (e.g., TBBPA). Collectively, these guidelines have pushed producers to cut back using flame retardant chemical substances in client merchandise. Additionally they mirror altering attitudes towards flame retardants within the family.
Regardless of this latest pattern, the priority over flame retardant toxicity is way from over. Many merchandise in California houses bought previous to 2013 include quite a few flame retardant chemical substances. Firefighters are constantly uncovered to those supplies when responding to fires in residential areas, resulting in an elevated danger of most cancers amongst firefighters. Furthermore, many different states proceed to permit flame retardant chemical substances in on a regular basis merchandise. The federal authorities has additionally been sluggish to undertake laws on flame retardants and has solely not too long ago begun in 2023 to request public feedback on knowledge wanted to assist the regulation of clusters of chemical substances.
The rise of wildfires in city areas requires a brand new have a look at the supplies being burned and the hurt leaching into the air. As illustrated by the latest California fires, chemical substances utilized in client supplies are failing to guard in opposition to the brutality of historic warmth. These fireplace retardant chemical substances may very well be doing extra hurt than good. Shoppers and producers should rethink whether or not these chemical substances are value it and whether or not different improvements can extra adequately shield not solely our houses but in addition our well being.
Concerning the writer
Jessica Samuels is a third-year twin diploma regulation and public well being scholar (J.D./MPH 2025). Her analysis pursuits embody genetics, environmental well being sciences, novel biotechnologies, and the FDA regulatory course of. She has beforehand printed work on the accuracy of ultrasound in predicting malignant ovarian lots. At HLS, Jessica is co-president of the Harvard Well being Legislation Society.
