In October 2024, we performed an in depth survey to know runners’ preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction with varied operating shoe manufacturers. The survey gathered responses from 794 runners, offering invaluable insights into operating shoe preferences and the way completely different manufacturers are perceived by their customers.
With this pattern measurement, at a 95% confidence degree, our survey findings have a margin of error of roughly ±3.5%. Whereas this means sturdy statistical significance, it’s essential to notice that these findings symbolize the views and behaviors of our survey respondents and might not be totally consultant of the general operating shoe market.
You’re free to make use of this knowledge on your personal articles, so long as you credit score us by linking again to our website. In order for you entry to the uncooked knowledge file, please electronic mail guru(at)runningshoesguru.com
Introduction
This evaluation explores six key facets of runners’ relationships with operating shoe manufacturers:
- Model Consideration: Which manufacturers runners take into account when searching for sneakers
- Buy Conduct: How consideration interprets into precise shopping for selections
- Favourite Manufacturers: Which manufacturers runners favor and why
- Vital Components: What drives model choice amongst runners
- Satisfaction Ranges: How happy runners are with their chosen manufacturers
- Future Buy Intentions: Which manufacturers runners plan to purchase subsequent
Model Consideration: Which model have you ever thought of shopping for previously 12 months?
The operating shoe market exhibits clear stratification by way of model consideration amongst runners.
Conventional running-focused manufacturers dominate the highest tier, with Asics (467) and Saucony (444) being thought of by considerably extra runners than different manufacturers.
These specialist operating manufacturers are adopted by a robust center tier consisting of New Stability (360), Hoka (359), and Brooks (341), every being thought of by roughly related numbers of runners.
Curiously, world athletic put on giants Nike (292) and Adidas (285) sit in a lower-middle tier, suggesting that regardless of their huge presence generally sportswear, they aren’t the go-to selections for devoted runners.
The consideration set is rounded out by Puma (176), Mizuno (125), and On (119), although it’s price noting that Puma’s comparatively stronger place would possibly mirror their latest push into the efficiency operating market.
The outcomes counsel that runners are likely to favor manufacturers with deep operating heritage and specialised operating experience over common athletic manufacturers, with conventional running-focused manufacturers commanding the vast majority of runner consideration.
Buy Behaviour: How consideration interprets into precise shopping for selections
precise purchases previously 12 months, Saucony (300) and Asics (292) preserve their management place from the consideration section, creating a transparent high tier considerably forward of their rivals.
A strong center tier emerges with Nike, New Stability, Hoka, and Brooks all clustered very intently collectively (181-183 purchases), adopted by Adidas (171).
The underside tier includes Puma (92), whereas Mizuno (54) and On (45) lag considerably behind – although this will mirror their smaller market presence or extra specialised positioning within the operating shoe market.
The conversion charge signifies what proportion of runners who thought of a model went on to make a purchase order from that model previously 12 months. That is calculated by dividing the variety of purchases by the variety of issues for every model, giving us perception into how successfully manufacturers convert curiosity into gross sales.
Saucony emerges because the clear chief, changing 67.6% of issues into purchases, adopted intently by Nike (62.7%) and Asics (62.5%) – an attention-grabbing mixture of specialist operating and common athletic manufacturers.
A definite center tier in conversion effectiveness contains Adidas (60%), Brooks (53.1%), and Puma (52.3%), whereas New Stability and Hoka hover across the 50% mark regardless of their sturdy consideration numbers.
Most notably, this knowledge challenges the narrative from the consideration numbers – whereas conventional operating manufacturers dominated consideration, the conversion charges present world athletic manufacturers Nike and Adidas performing remarkably effectively at changing curiosity into gross sales.
On the decrease finish, Mizuno (43.2%) and notably On (37.8%) present considerably decrease conversion charges, suggesting potential obstacles between curiosity and buy for these manufacturers – probably associated to components corresponding to pricing, availability, or the necessity to strive these manufacturers in particular person earlier than buy.
This conversion evaluation paints a special image from the pure consideration knowledge, suggesting that whereas specialised operating manufacturers would possibly seize preliminary curiosity extra successfully, each specialist and main athletic manufacturers will be equally efficient at changing that curiosity into gross sales.
This might point out that components past pure operating heritage – corresponding to pricing technique, distribution networks, or advertising and marketing effectiveness – play essential roles within the remaining buy choice.
Favourite manufacturers: Which manufacturers runners favor and why
When runners had been requested to pick out their single favourite model, Saucony (192) emerges because the clear chief, considerably forward of second-place Asics (142). A definite center tier varieties with Brooks (97), Nike (95), and Hoka (91) clustered intently collectively, adopted by New Stability (66) and Adidas (60). The underside tier consists of Puma (26), Mizuno (18), and On (7), exhibiting a big drop-off from the upper tiers.
Wanting on the development from consideration to favourite model gives fascinating insights into model loyalty and choice energy. Saucony exhibits exceptional effectiveness in changing each consideration (43.2% of those that thought of Saucony named it their favourite) and purchases (64.0% of purchasers take into account it their favourite) into model choice. Equally, Nike and Brooks present sturdy skill to transform purchasers into loyal followers, with 51.9% and 53.6% of their purchasers respectively naming them as favourite manufacturers. In distinction, manufacturers like On (15.6% of purchasers title it favourite) and Puma (28.3%) wrestle to transform even their clients into model advocates.
This development evaluation reveals that whereas some manufacturers could also be extensively thought of or bought, their skill to change into a runner’s favourite varies dramatically. The info means that sure manufacturers, notably Saucony, have discovered a candy spot in not simply attracting consideration however in delivering an expertise that converts runners into model advocates. In the meantime, the comparatively low conversion charges for some manufacturers would possibly point out both a job as a complementary quite than main operating shoe, or potential gaps between expectations and expertise.
Vital Components: What drives model choice amongst runners
When analyzing the components that drive model choice amongst runners, two components clearly dominate: Consolation (346) and Efficiency (333), collectively accounting for about 85% of all responses. There may be then a big drop to a second tier consisting of Sturdiness (48) and Value (28), adopted by a 3rd tier of Fashion/Design (17), Model Status (12), and Availability (10).
how these components differ by model reveals attention-grabbing patterns. Brooks (56.7%), Hoka (67.0%), and New Stability (59.1%) are predominantly chosen for Consolation, whereas Saucony (52.6%), Puma (61.5%), and Adidas (48.3%) are primarily chosen for Efficiency. Asics exhibits a extra balanced profile between Efficiency (43.0%) and Consolation (41.5%). Curiously, Nike stands out with a good portion of runners (9.5%) citing Fashion/Design as their main purpose for choice – the very best amongst all manufacturers for this issue.
These findings counsel that whereas runners primarily make their model selections based mostly on practical facets (Consolation and Efficiency), completely different manufacturers have efficiently positioned themselves alongside these axes in distinct methods. The info additionally reveals that components usually emphasised in advertising and marketing, corresponding to model and model status, play a surprisingly minor position in runners’ model preferences, with sensible issues clearly dominating the decision-making course of.
Satisfaction Ranges: How happy runners are with their chosen manufacturers
The satisfaction survey reveals overwhelmingly constructive suggestions throughout all manufacturers, with a powerful general satisfaction rating of 4.45 out of 5. The distribution is closely skewed towards excessive satisfaction, with 93.8% of respondents score their sneakers both 4 or 5 stars. Extra particularly, 51.5% gave a 5-star score and 42.3% gave a 4-star score, whereas solely 6.2% rated their sneakers 3 stars or under.
particular person manufacturers, satisfaction scores vary from 4.17 to 4.57, exhibiting persistently excessive satisfaction throughout the board. Whereas On leads with a 4.57 common, its small pattern measurement (n=7) makes this discovering much less dependable. Amongst manufacturers with substantial pattern sizes, Hoka and Brooks share the highest place (each 4.53), adopted intently by Puma (4.50), Asics and Saucony (each 4.49). Notably, even the lowest-rated manufacturers – Nike (4.31) and Adidas (4.17) – preserve very constructive scores above 4 stars, although they do present a barely increased proportion of 3-star scores in comparison with different manufacturers.
These remarkably excessive satisfaction scores throughout all manufacturers counsel that operating shoe producers are usually assembly or exceeding runner expectations. The minimal variation between manufacturers (a variety of simply 0.4 between the very best and lowest scores amongst main manufacturers) signifies that whereas runners could have sturdy model preferences, the precise expertise with their chosen model tends to be persistently constructive.
Future Buy Intentions: Which manufacturers runners plan to purchase subsequent
The chart compares the variety of runners who at present favor a model with those that plan to purchase it subsequent, proven as a proportion change. As an example, a +47% for New Stability implies that 47% extra runners plan to purchase New Stability subsequent in comparison with those that at present take into account it their favourite model (from 66 present followers to 97 future patrons).
future buy intentions reveals some vital shifts within the operating shoe market. Two distinct teams emerge: manufacturers gaining momentum and types experiencing decline. On exhibits probably the most dramatic enhance, with almost 4 occasions as many runners planning to purchase it in comparison with present favorites (+285.7%, from 7 to 27 runners). New Stability additionally exhibits sturdy momentum with 47% extra future patrons than present favorites (+31 runners), adopted by Puma with a 61.5% enhance (+16 runners). On the opposite finish, Saucony exhibits probably the most vital decline, with 33.9% fewer future buy intentions than present favorites (-65 runners), whereas Nike additionally sees a notable 25.3% lower (-24 runners).
The center of the market exhibits attention-grabbing stability, with Brooks, Hoka, and Asics sustaining almost equal numbers between present favorites and future purchases (variations below 10%). This means these manufacturers have discovered a secure market place, neither gaining vital new converts nor dropping present supporters in massive numbers.
These patterns might point out a market in transition, with runners exhibiting elevated curiosity in manufacturers that could be seen as challengers to conventional market leaders. The sturdy exhibiting from On, New Stability, and Puma, mixed with the decline in Saucony and Nike buy intentions, would possibly mirror altering preferences within the operating neighborhood or profitable innovation and advertising and marketing from the ascending manufacturers.
Some remaining observations
Wanting throughout all facets of this operating shoe market evaluation, a number of key patterns emerge that paint an image of a dynamic and evolving market. The evaluation reveals each the energy of conventional manufacturers and the emergence of thrilling challengers, suggesting an business in transition.
Market Dynamics
- Conventional operating manufacturers (Asics, Saucony) dominate preliminary model consideration
- Nevertheless, excessive consideration doesn’t robotically translate to purchases or loyalty
- Excessive general satisfaction (4.45/5.0 common) throughout all manufacturers
- Market exhibits vital fluidity in future buy intentions
The info reveals an attention-grabbing pressure between specialist operating manufacturers and common athletic manufacturers. Whereas operating specialists excel at getting into the consideration set, world athletic giants like Nike and Adidas present exceptional effectivity in changing consideration to buy. This challenges the notion that critical runners robotically favor specialist manufacturers.
Rising Challengers & Future Implications
- On and Puma present exceptional momentum in future buy intentions
- On demonstrates probably the most dramatic progress from present favorites to future intentions
- New Stability gaining vital floor in future buy plans
- Excessive satisfaction throughout manufacturers allows simpler model switching
- Extra various and aggressive market more likely to emerge
- Established leaders might want to work tougher to keep up their positions
These patterns level to an business the place established leaders can’t relaxation on their laurels.
Whereas conventional operating manufacturers preserve sturdy positions, the excessive satisfaction scores throughout all manufacturers mixed with vital variation in future buy intentions point out that runners are more and more prepared to experiment. The operating shoe market of tomorrow could look fairly completely different from right this moment’s.
Need to use this knowledge on your personal analysis? Ship us an electronic mail at guru(at)runningshoesguru.com!