Final yr, a authorities report linking excessive ranges of fluoride with decrease IQ in youngsters contributed to debate over including fluoride to ingesting water. The evaluation behind that report is out at present.
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
Most individuals within the U.S. get fluoridated ingesting water. It has been the usual for practically 80 years to assist cease cavities, and it is thought-about a serious achievement in public well being as a result of it has prevented a variety of cavities. A authorities report on excessive ranges of fluoride and kids’s IQ is out at present, although it’s contributing to debate over the follow. The evaluation behind the report is out at present. Right here to speak about it – NPR’s Pien Huang. Hello, Pien.
PIEN HUANG, BYLINE: Hey, Mary Louise.
KELLY: Hey. What does the analysis truly present?
HUANG: OK. So the most recent analysis, which is out at present, is that this paper within the medical journal JAMA Pediatrics. And it is by authorities scientists on the Nationwide Toxicology Program, which is a part of the Nationwide Institutes of Well being. What it does is that it appears to be like at just a few dozen research that different individuals have performed, principally researchers in China and India, and it finds a hyperlink between excessive ranges of fluoride and a small lower in youngsters’s IQ. That is one thing that they are saying they’ve average confidence in. Now, this conclusion shouldn’t be new. That is the analysis behind a authorities report that was truly printed again in August.
KELLY: OK.
HUANG: However this analysis has truly already been fairly influential within the debate over fluoride in ingesting water.
KELLY: And that is one thing – am I proper? – that Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump’s decide to move Well being and Human Companies – one thing he has highlighted. He needs fluoride gone. Simply to be crystal clear, the information doesn’t say that fluoride in ingesting water is dangerous. Is that proper?
HUANG: That is proper, Mary Louise, on each of these counts. So the information doesn’t say that fluoride in ingesting water is dangerous, no less than not on the ranges which are advisable within the U.S. ingesting water provide. What it does present is the potential of harms when the fluoride ranges are greater than twice what’s advisable, and that does occur. You already know, there are locations the place fluoride happens naturally within the soil and groundwater, and folks can get that increased publicity. Within the U.S., that impacts about 2 to three million individuals. However the evaluation continues to be fueling this debate over the low ranges of fluoride which are added to ingesting water at a lot decrease ranges than that. And Steven Levy, a public well being dentist on the College of Iowa, says that utilizing this information for that debate is a stretch.
STEVEN LEVY: The foremost drawback is that the science shouldn’t be as robust as it’s offered by these authors.
HUANG: You already know, he says that they did not actually totally contemplate some newer analysis that casts doubt on the hyperlinks between fluoride publicity and IQ, and he says that as a result of we’re so used to water fluoridation, we take the advantages of it without any consideration.
KELLY: And, once more, amongst these advantages, we all know that fluoridated water prevents cavities. Are there cheap inquiries to ask right here, although?
HUANG: Yeah, there are, and the scientific debate is elevating a few of them. One of many questions facilities round individuals’s whole fluoride consumption. So apart from ingesting water, individuals can get fluoride from toothpaste, tea, meals like spinach and seafood. And the researchers for this paper are fearful that these sources mixed may very well be exposing individuals to some dangerous ranges. One other query individuals is elevating is on the profit facet. So there was this different latest evaluation that confirmed that whereas fluoride in water reduces cavities, it is much less important now than it was earlier than fluoride in toothpaste turned a daily factor. So there are some individuals saying it is time to reweigh the dangers and advantages given how society has modified.
KELLY: So the place does all this depart us? What is the subsequent step?
HUANG: Yeah. So two issues – the Environmental Safety Company has this deadline developing within the subsequent two weeks over whether or not they need to be interesting this latest court docket choice telling them to tighten their fluoride laws. After which there’s additionally Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as you talked about earlier, Trump’s nominee for well being secretary. He instructed NPR that one in all his priorities is to get the nation to cease fluoridating the water. So we are going to see what occurs.
KELLY: NPR’s Pien Huang. Thanks.
HUANG: Thanks.
(SOUNDBITE OF CORMEGA SONG, “ALL I NEED IS YOU”)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content is probably not in its last type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability could differ. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.